Friday, September 26, 2014
Archives and Research
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Flip the Switch
This week we have explored the concept of social bookmarking. I reviewed the tool, Inoreader, and found that this would be a useful tool for the classroom and as well as personally. My understanding of the tool is that it is a "Pinterest" of online reading materials. For current events, a subscriber to this site can find articles, not websites or advertisements, on a specific topic. I did not find it helpful for historical topics, but that could mean that I need to further explore the tool. Most of the texts that students read in class can be related to some current event. Using this tool could eliminate the unnecessary browsing through ads, blogs or content that might not be recommended for sources in a formal paper. If an instructor wants students to go directly to articles, this would be the perfect tool. However, it seems most applicable to current events.
In response to the ban on laptops, I agree and disagree. I love the idea of the "kill switch". There are times that I feel it is a hindrance or a distraction for students to have access to social media, Google and the internet during a discussion or a lecture. As a public school teacher, I am encouraged to lecture as seldom as possible, so discussions would be my greatest issue. I do not want students to "sparknote" the answer to a question during a whole group discussion. I want to know how they think, what their analysis of a work or character is, and what they think will happen next. Being able to just temporarily suspend the internet connection would provide opportunity for these rich discussions with real and honest thought and response. Within minutes, however, I may have them use the web to find analysis of the same thing from others and compare and contrast these perspectives.
In regards to my disagreement with this article, I do not feel that removal of the laptop is the answer. Removal would limit access for those who may only have the access on the school grounds or through school programs. The laptop should be accessible at all times, but there may be times when internet access should be suspended or limited. For example, I often use Edmodo for projects, discussion boards, etc with my high school students. I would like to be able to "lock " them to just one particular site or place at a time. This will ensure focus on the particular task at hand and limit distractions. For some students, the internet is too tempting. I can relate. Sometimes it is too easy to lose focus and check your bank account or shop or use social media. The multitasking that comes from the web is it not always beneficial. Students do need to understand how to find information in a book as classmate.Dena Fulton points out. The internet and laptops should be a supplementary tool but should be accessible often enough to keep students savvy and familiar with new and upcoming tools
In response to the ban on laptops, I agree and disagree. I love the idea of the "kill switch". There are times that I feel it is a hindrance or a distraction for students to have access to social media, Google and the internet during a discussion or a lecture. As a public school teacher, I am encouraged to lecture as seldom as possible, so discussions would be my greatest issue. I do not want students to "sparknote" the answer to a question during a whole group discussion. I want to know how they think, what their analysis of a work or character is, and what they think will happen next. Being able to just temporarily suspend the internet connection would provide opportunity for these rich discussions with real and honest thought and response. Within minutes, however, I may have them use the web to find analysis of the same thing from others and compare and contrast these perspectives.
In regards to my disagreement with this article, I do not feel that removal of the laptop is the answer. Removal would limit access for those who may only have the access on the school grounds or through school programs. The laptop should be accessible at all times, but there may be times when internet access should be suspended or limited. For example, I often use Edmodo for projects, discussion boards, etc with my high school students. I would like to be able to "lock " them to just one particular site or place at a time. This will ensure focus on the particular task at hand and limit distractions. For some students, the internet is too tempting. I can relate. Sometimes it is too easy to lose focus and check your bank account or shop or use social media. The multitasking that comes from the web is it not always beneficial. Students do need to understand how to find information in a book as classmate.Dena Fulton points out. The internet and laptops should be a supplementary tool but should be accessible often enough to keep students savvy and familiar with new and upcoming tools
Friday, September 12, 2014
Week Four Readings
This week has been the most challenging for me. I haven't dealt with a wiki until now other than posting discussions to wikis that were already creating for the purpose of professional development. Additionally, that experience has been over five years ago.
The topic of Wikipedia as a source has evolved since I was first introduced to the topic. Most of my students and myself were under the impression, and had been instructed to never use Wikipedia as a source. Even though I didn't share this with my students, I have found myself visiting Wikipedia for the minimal purpose of having a starting place, looking to the sources it cited, and double-checking the information that way. Though there are some limitations to Wikipedia, there are also advantages.
When teaching middle school social students, I became frustrated with the outdated information in the textbook. Though I wasn't a " textbook only" teacher, it was new content to me and that's where I started. In certain parts of the world, history was changing and evolving in real time. Wikipedia accounts for this. Information on Wikipedia can be updated in real-time. What an advantage that did not exist when looking only to textbooks, printed every decade or so, for historical news. Wikipedia is reflective of our current world: constant change.
One reading this week, "Wikiality in my Classroom" was a great article that related both sides of the Wiki debate. Just like so many tools emerging in society today, proper application, balance of use, and well-trained instructors and professionals will make the difference. This reminds me of the first week discussing Bill Gates and the reflection that you can't just give a kid a laptop. As educators, we can't just tell them to "google it". Knowledge of credible sources, knowledge and experience with comparing sources, definitely allows a place for Wikipedia. It also utilizes the critical thinking and inferential skills that students need to develop. Look at this, look at that, apply what you already know, make a conclusion.
It is also important to note that textbooks haven't always told the truth. I remember reading in my previous graduate program, "Lies my History Teacher told me" by James Loewen. This book helped me realize that history in itself is a matter of perspective. Consider the American Indians and how they were depicted in textbooks, stories and elementary school lessons even when I was in Elementary School in the 1980s.
Wikipedia is a tool that can be modified, updated in real-time. Students need to be able to critique sources, compile sources, apply their own knowledge and experience and make conclusions. Online research is an appropriate tool for that. The stereotypes surrounding Wikipedia reflect the lack of knowledge and instruction that educators receive. It is not, however, useful if the researcher ( student) doesn't have the ability to infer, judge, compare and evaluate.
One one last note: Colbert's test of Wikipedia, the information concerning elephants, is an extreme example. If other sources contradicted this, one could assume that false or misleading information had been used. In fact, Colbert's whole analysis of Wikipedia is extreme. I conclude that most of the information on Wikipedia is usable, but like any other source, I would continue to research it, compare and contrast it with other credible sources.
The topic of Wikipedia as a source has evolved since I was first introduced to the topic. Most of my students and myself were under the impression, and had been instructed to never use Wikipedia as a source. Even though I didn't share this with my students, I have found myself visiting Wikipedia for the minimal purpose of having a starting place, looking to the sources it cited, and double-checking the information that way. Though there are some limitations to Wikipedia, there are also advantages.
When teaching middle school social students, I became frustrated with the outdated information in the textbook. Though I wasn't a " textbook only" teacher, it was new content to me and that's where I started. In certain parts of the world, history was changing and evolving in real time. Wikipedia accounts for this. Information on Wikipedia can be updated in real-time. What an advantage that did not exist when looking only to textbooks, printed every decade or so, for historical news. Wikipedia is reflective of our current world: constant change.
One reading this week, "Wikiality in my Classroom" was a great article that related both sides of the Wiki debate. Just like so many tools emerging in society today, proper application, balance of use, and well-trained instructors and professionals will make the difference. This reminds me of the first week discussing Bill Gates and the reflection that you can't just give a kid a laptop. As educators, we can't just tell them to "google it". Knowledge of credible sources, knowledge and experience with comparing sources, definitely allows a place for Wikipedia. It also utilizes the critical thinking and inferential skills that students need to develop. Look at this, look at that, apply what you already know, make a conclusion.
It is also important to note that textbooks haven't always told the truth. I remember reading in my previous graduate program, "Lies my History Teacher told me" by James Loewen. This book helped me realize that history in itself is a matter of perspective. Consider the American Indians and how they were depicted in textbooks, stories and elementary school lessons even when I was in Elementary School in the 1980s.
Wikipedia is a tool that can be modified, updated in real-time. Students need to be able to critique sources, compile sources, apply their own knowledge and experience and make conclusions. Online research is an appropriate tool for that. The stereotypes surrounding Wikipedia reflect the lack of knowledge and instruction that educators receive. It is not, however, useful if the researcher ( student) doesn't have the ability to infer, judge, compare and evaluate.
One one last note: Colbert's test of Wikipedia, the information concerning elephants, is an extreme example. If other sources contradicted this, one could assume that false or misleading information had been used. In fact, Colbert's whole analysis of Wikipedia is extreme. I conclude that most of the information on Wikipedia is usable, but like any other source, I would continue to research it, compare and contrast it with other credible sources.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Week Three Readings
I am excited about the positive outlooks concerning Twitter and other social media. It seems like we often hear the negativity of these media tools, how they take time from our families and the marvels of folks scrolling, tweeting, and facebooking on their mobile phone constantly, avoiding traditional human contact. Most of the readings this week supported the idea that social media can foster future "real" relationships, break the ice, and set up conversations that might have otherwise never taken place. I agree with the idea that social media keeps us close without being too close, a sense of knowing each other while continuing with our own daily busy lives. I can think of several current friends that grew from Facebook acquaintance status. Simple conversations, liking a picture or a comment can set up easy conversations that develop naturally. It truly provides a sense of "we are all here together". Growing up and living in a small town, I should be used to all knowing all, but social media has made this even more real.
Prior to this week, I had a twitter account. I did this solely for school, as it was a requirement during a professional development, yet anything beyond having an account never came to fruition. I never learned how to navigate twitter. I am going to try again. Several of my students are following me. They are going to get bored! On the other hand, I am excited about implementing a Twitter project in the classroom with an upcoming novel. I learned of the idea from the week's reading of specific classroom implementations. Students will assume a character role and will tweet accordingly through the progression of the novel, with all students following and being followed by their classmates. What a real, authentic way to engage students in the reading long after class hours! I am taking a gamble on this project that hopefully will be a small one. Until recently, my district has kept a policy on the books that any social media connection between teachers and students was forbidden. A committee is now in place to revisit these policies. My students are extremely excited about using this tool in the classroom.
The document concerning teens and their online privacy needs was an interesting read. I found it reassuring that most students do not feel that online access makes them more vulnerable to bullying. My inference is that even though online bullying may occur and it may seem a safe place for a weak bully to intimidate another, it is traceable unlike the traditional bullying that was " he said, she said". It was surprising to me as well, that Facebook was the most popular social media. I hear many students commenting about Instagram, Twitter and Tumblr. It seems that our youth is accepting the social media world and has a more positive outlook regarding this tool. It can be used positively and they get this. Hopefully, the old folks will catch up to the positive perspective.
Prior to this week, I had a twitter account. I did this solely for school, as it was a requirement during a professional development, yet anything beyond having an account never came to fruition. I never learned how to navigate twitter. I am going to try again. Several of my students are following me. They are going to get bored! On the other hand, I am excited about implementing a Twitter project in the classroom with an upcoming novel. I learned of the idea from the week's reading of specific classroom implementations. Students will assume a character role and will tweet accordingly through the progression of the novel, with all students following and being followed by their classmates. What a real, authentic way to engage students in the reading long after class hours! I am taking a gamble on this project that hopefully will be a small one. Until recently, my district has kept a policy on the books that any social media connection between teachers and students was forbidden. A committee is now in place to revisit these policies. My students are extremely excited about using this tool in the classroom.
The document concerning teens and their online privacy needs was an interesting read. I found it reassuring that most students do not feel that online access makes them more vulnerable to bullying. My inference is that even though online bullying may occur and it may seem a safe place for a weak bully to intimidate another, it is traceable unlike the traditional bullying that was " he said, she said". It was surprising to me as well, that Facebook was the most popular social media. I hear many students commenting about Instagram, Twitter and Tumblr. It seems that our youth is accepting the social media world and has a more positive outlook regarding this tool. It can be used positively and they get this. Hopefully, the old folks will catch up to the positive perspective.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)